Sharma, Srishti and Sharma, Prama (2025) A Theoretical Analysis on the Comparison between Ego Defense Mechanisms use in Type A and Type B Personality Traits. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 10 (5): 25may1749. pp. 2646-2649. ISSN 2456-2165
![IJISRT25MAY1749.pdf [thumbnail of IJISRT25MAY1749.pdf]](https://eprint.ijisrt.org/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
IJISRT25MAY1749.pdf - Published Version
Download (296kB)
Abstract
Ego defense mechanisms are integral part of an individual’s personality. This plays a crucial role to shape and development of personality. Ego defense mechanisms are psychological strategies that people use to cope with daily stress, anxiety and other uncomfortable emotions. These mechanisms of defenses help people to protect their ego from the stressful situations, lowering their level of guilt or shame. With a comparative analysis of Type A and Type B personality traits, this research paper suggests a theoretical exploration of the interaction between personality traits and the use of ego defense mechanisms. In order to understand how innate personality orientations impact the use of defense mechanisms in stressful situations, this study generates a conceptual framework. The analysis of the previous researches suggests that individuals with Type A personality traits, characterized by competitiveness, urgency, and a predisposition to chronic stress tend to rely on more maladaptive defenses such as denial, displacement, and rationalization, which may amplify stress reactivity. In contrast, those individual with Type B personality traits typically demonstrate a greater tendency for adaptive defenses like sublimation, humor, and intellectualization and it enhances psychological resilience and more effective stress defenses that can protect their mental health. Through integrating these diverse perspectives, the present study proposes a conceptual model that explains the pathways from personality driven defense mechanisms to their psychological outcomes. This theoretical framework not only improves our understanding of differential stress responses but also offers practical implications for modifying interventions aimed at promoting mental health.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | Q Science > Q Science (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences > School of Psychology |
Depositing User: | Editor IJISRT Publication |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jun 2025 09:09 |
Last Modified: | 17 Jun 2025 09:09 |
URI: | https://eprint.ijisrt.org/id/eprint/1231 |